A Comparison of 1.0 m and 1.5 m Row Irrigated Cotton Water Use Efficiency, Gross Margins, Yield and Quality in Warren, NSW, Australia

Date Issued:2015-06-30

Abstract

Water is the most limiting input in irrigated cotton production. Compaction reduces access to the soil water resource and reduces soil health. Incorporating Controlled Traffic Farming (CTF) in 1.5 m row irrigated cotton improves water use efficiency (WUE). This investigation compared 1.0 m and 1.5 m row-spacing on cotton yield, fibre quality and WUE. The 1.5 m row-spacing cotton was hypothesised to have a similar gross margin and fibre characteristics but greater WUE and yield per plant through access to a larger soil water resource. This replicated study was conducted over two years (2013-14 and 2014-15) and had an RCB design with a field scale whole block experiment which contained nine replicates of 1.0 m and 1.5 m row treatments. The field scale whole block contained two large field blocks of 1.0 m and 1.5 m treatments. The 1.5 m cotton had a greater WUE by producing 0.09 more bales per ML. This reduced the irrigation requirement in the 1.5 m resulting in a higher gross margin than 1.0 m cotton ($2658/ha and $2466/ha, respectively). The 1m cotton out yielded the 1.5 m in both seasons by 1.8 bales/ha (16%) and 1.09 bales/ha (6%) respectively. Yield differences in the 1.0 m cotton were only achieved through an increase in inputs. Fibre quality was slightly better in 1.5 m cotton. The 1.5 m row-spacing, based on its capacity to improve WUE, is more suitable for water limited environments. Furthermore, CTF provides greater water use efficiency by minimising soil compaction.

Show Full Details

This item appears in the following categories